A number of our very own foregoing considerations offer credence into the contention one metaphor is actually an analogous term. This is substantiated by St Thomas’ process concerned thirteen of the latest Prima Pars , given that for the post around three, when he asks or no name is told you properly regarding God, the resistance delivered to the enjoy is anywhere between incorporate proprie and you may improprie for the latter known having metaphor. Next, inside the article half dozen, as write research paper online he requires when the names popular so you’re able to Jesus and you may animals try basic told you out of pets, the newest distinction proprie/improprie is apparently a subdivision away from analogous identity. St Thomas begins because of the proclaiming that “inside the omnibus nominibus quae de pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for each respectum advertising unum: mais aussi ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur when you look at the definitione omnium. Mais aussi quia ratio quam significat nomen each prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur in definitione aliorum, ainsi que for every single posterius de- aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant offer illud primum vel magis vel minus.” This is exactly exemplified from the dated legitimate, “match.” “Sic therefore omni nomina quae metaphorice de- Deo dicuntur for each and every prius de- creaturis dicuntur quam de Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines post reports creaturas.” St. Thomas observes the new resemblance regarding ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) intended when you look at the “smiling meadow” plus calling Goodness a great lion.
As he goes on to speak from other names “quae non metaphorice dicuntur de Deo,” new clear feeling is that he is talking away from other days off analogous brands than simply metaphors
Are there texts where St Thomas opposes metaphor and you may analogy? When we turn to the fresh new opinions into the Metaphysics , we find St Thomas determining “potency” towards the analogous and you will equivocal settings. “Potency” mode unique. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum offer quosdam analogiae.” The fresh equivocal settings out-of efficiency is exemplified by-the-way we discuss about it 3 on the 3rd electricity as well as the cube while the energy of the range. “Et propter hoc each quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens when you look at the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens during the rem” Again good proportionality find. These equivocal modes really are metaphors is obvious regarding synchronous passageway in-book Delta during the commenting on what St Thomas begins, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” What makes this type of modes metaphorical rather than analogical? “Their therefore modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur advertisement unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, mais aussi omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur post aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In a nutshell, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor so you can analogous uses out of a reputation as the second and never the former involve a decrease so you’re able to what’s mainly denominated by the term involved while, is always to they you would like mentioning, regarding the text of your own Summa i sensed another ago, the newest metaphor wasn’t prominent about extension proprie about basis. Or perhaps is it the way in which of the regard to what exactly is principally signifed because of the title and that distinguishes metaphor off example, use proprie from improprie ? Anything named metaphorically is, whatsoever, brought to become the same as just what term securely represents.
Whatever you is going to be looking for is some technique for justifying the quite common variation regarding metaphor and you will example in a way that no appeal is designed to Cajetan’s division off analogy towards attribution and you may right proportionality
An aporia possess certainly emerged, thus, and its particular resolution can only just end up being got because of the choosing exactly what an excellent metaphor is actually and you may what an enthusiastic analogous name’s. Answers to these concerns would be to permit me to understand the apparently contradictory statements out-of Aquinas.